Parachute research paper
Admit it, you've read a headline before and then pretended like you read the whole article later when you wanted to talk about it.
Nevertheless, we believe that such trials remain the gold standard for the evaluation of most new treatments. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial.
Bmj parachute 2018
But in the BMJ Christmas edition, we finally have a randomized controlled trial of parachutes! They add that prior research shows participants who might stand to gain the most from the experimental treatment often are less likely to be included in clinical trials. Comparison: An empty backpack. There was no difference in the primary outcome. We welcome feedback. Their survival rates were then compared after they hit the ground. A leap of faith in anecdotal evidence The study, published in the light-hearted Christmas edition of BMJ , involved 23 test subjects who were randomly sorted into two groups. For the study, the researchers tested the effectiveness of parachutes on 23 people falling out of airplanes. DOI: The study authors consider the research a tongue-in-cheek illustration of an important point about interpreting results of medical research. Citation: Yeh, Robert W. December 17, Be wary of parachute journalism. But, according to science, you'd be wrong.
Yeh et al. There was no difference in the primary outcome. The finding is detailed Thursday Dec.
Scientists working at medical schools across the United States discovered that parachutes don't lower the death rate of people jumping out of airplanes.
This post was updated on December 18, to include comments from an interview with lead author Robert Yeh. There is an old joke that says "If your parachute doesn't deploy, don't worry: you have the rest of your life to fix it.
Parachute research paper
The authors suggest that this resembles common practice in clinical trials, where a small fraction of the patients screened are included. They equipped half of the participants with parachutes, and had the other half jump out of the planes with empty North Face backpacks strapped to their backs. By clearly showing how accepted procedures can be used to create an absurd little paper, the authors remind us to look closely at the findings of any study. Hopefully we can learn about the complexities of science. Rather, interpretation requires a complete and critical appraisal of the study. DOI: Our findings should give momentary pause to experts who advocate for routine use of parachutes for jumps from aircraft in recreational or military settings. The airplane was both on the ground and stationary, as they thought it would be impossible to get people to agree to leap from a moving plane several thousand feet up without a parachute.
The Results 23 people participated out of 92 screened.
based on 11 review